Things That Go Bump — And Mean It

Things That Go Bump — And Mean It

The supernatural genre runs on a specific promise: that the world is larger than it appears, that something operates behind the visible surface, and that contact with that something is not safe. The best entries here honor that promise by making their supernatural elements genuinely threatening rather than spectacular — by treating the unknown as unknown rather than as a special effects opportunity.

These twenty entries span film and television from the 1980s to the present, cover ghosts, demons, witches, psychic phenomena, parallel dimensions, and the specific territory where the supernatural bleeds into the theological. Vampires have their own list. Everything else that goes bump — and means it — is here.

Writers looking to craft their own supernatural and horror fiction will find essential techniques in the Horror Writer’s Handbook.

↑ All Entries

1. Supernatural (2005–2020)

2005–2020 · TV
⭐ Rating: 3–10 (Season Dependent)
Eric Kripke / The CW

“Driver picks the music. Shotgun shuts his cakehole.”

Eric Kripke designed Supernatural as a five-season story. Seasons one through five are that story, and it is one of the best long-form supernatural narratives in American television: two brothers working the American highway system as hunters of things that most people don’t believe in, against a mythology that escalates from monster-of-the-week to full biblical apocalypse with enough structural integrity that the escalation feels earned rather than inflated. Season two is the high point — the writing is tight, the emotional stakes are specific, and the show understands that the horror works better when it is personal rather than cosmic. Seasons three through five maintain that quality while closing Kripke’s arc.

Then the show ran ten more seasons. The quality is uneven at best, redundant at worst. The same emotional beats recycle — Sam and Dean betray each other, reconcile, face an escalating threat, defeat it, face a bigger one. Characters die and return so frequently that death loses all narrative weight by season eight. The show demonstrates both what long-form supernatural television can achieve and what happens when a network refuses to let a completed story end. Watch seasons two through six. Consider the rest optional.

For WritersKripke’s original five-season plan is the lesson: design your supernatural narrative with a specific endpoint and build every element toward it. The mythology of Supernatural — the demon deals, the apocalypse arc, the specific rules of the universe — works because it was designed to pay off in season five. When a supernatural series loses its way, the cause is almost always the same: the mythology was not designed for a specific endpoint, so it keeps expanding without being able to close. Know where you are going before you build the road.

↑ All Entries

2. Twin Peaks (1990–1991 / 2017)

1990– · TV
⭐ 9.5/10
David Lynch / Mark Frost / ABC

“The owls are not what they seem.”

David Lynch and Mark Frost invented a new category of television with Twin Peaks: the supernatural mystery that uses a small-town murder investigation as the surface of something considerably darker underneath. The Black Lodge, BOB, the White Lodge — these are not explained because Lynch does not traffic in explanation. The supernatural elements operate as pure dread, organized around a specific visual and sonic grammar that Lynch owns completely. Angelo Badalamenti’s score is as important as any script element. The town of Twin Peaks is the most fully realized fictional community in American television.

Season two collapses after the Laura Palmer mystery resolves — Lynch and Frost lost interest once the network forced them to answer the central question — but recovers somewhat toward the end. The 2017 revival, The Return, is Lynch operating without commercial constraints and producing something that defies conventional evaluation: eighteen hours of television that functions as a feature film, a fever dream, and a meditation on time and loss simultaneously. Part 8 alone justifies the entire project.

For WritersLynch uses the supernatural not to explain the horror but to embody it — BOB is not a metaphor for abuse, he is abuse given supernatural form, which is more honest than metaphor because it does not reduce the horror to an argument. When you use supernatural elements in fiction, consider whether they are doing symbolic work (representing something) or existential work (being something). The most disturbing supernatural fiction makes the reader feel they have encountered something real rather than something that stands for something real.

↑ All Entries

3. The X-Files (1993–2002)

1993–2002 · TV
⭐ 9/10 (Seasons 1–7)
Chris Carter / Fox

“The truth is out there.”

Chris Carter’s series ran the best supernatural procedural in television history for seven seasons, then ran two more into diminishing returns. The central relationship between Mulder and Scully — one who believes, one who requires evidence, both of whom are right about different things — is the best-designed partnership in the genre, because it produces genuine epistemological friction rather than simple disagreement. The monster-of-the-week episodes at their best — Squeeze, Humbug, Clyde Bruckman’s Final Repose, Home — are as good as anything American television produced in the 1990s.

The mythology arc is where the show eventually defeats itself: the alien conspiracy expands past the point where resolution is possible, and Carter never found a satisfying endpoint. The show’s lesson is the inverse of Supernatural’s — the standalone episodes are the achievement, not the mythology, and the mythology’s failure to close reveals that it was never designed to close.

For WritersThe Mulder/Scully dynamic works because both positions are genuinely defensible — Mulder’s intuitive belief and Scully’s empirical skepticism are both correct about different things in different episodes. When you design an investigative partnership for supernatural fiction, resist making one partner simply wrong. The friction that produces the best drama is two people who are both right operating from incompatible frameworks, not one right person arguing with one wrong person.

↑ All Entries

4. Poltergeist (1982)

1982 · Film
⭐ 8.5/10
Tobe Hooper / Steven Spielberg

“They’re here.”

The Spielberg/Hooper collaboration produces the definitive suburban haunted house film: a family whose home is built on a cemetery, whose youngest daughter is taken into another dimension through the television set, and whose rescue requires them to understand that the comfortable material world they inhabit is built on something buried and denied. The horror is personal and domestic rather than cosmic — the monsters are attracted to the children, not the adults, which is the film’s most honest observation about what parents most fear.

The practical effects throughout remain extraordinary — the kitchen chairs, the clown, the face-pulling scene — because they were designed to create specific images rather than general spectacle. Zelda Rubinstein’s Tangina is the film’s most distinctive element: a medium who treats the supernatural as a professional environment she understands and navigates with matter-of-fact competence. The film built the template for domestic supernatural horror that has been followed ever since.

For WritersPoltergeist grounds its supernatural threat in specifically domestic space — the television, the closet, the children’s bedroom — which makes the horror personal rather than abstract. The threat targets what the family loves most in the space where they feel safest. When you design a supernatural threat for domestic horror, identify what the family values most and make the threat operate through that specific thing. Generic hauntings produce generic fear; hauntings that attack specific attachments produce specific dread.
CTAReady to write your own supernatural fiction? The Horror Writer’s Handbook breaks down the techniques behind fiction’s most enduring fears.

↑ All Entries

5. The Sixth Sense (1999)

1999 · Film
⭐ 9/10
M. Night Shyamalan

“I see dead people.”

Shyamalan’s film is the most precisely engineered supernatural mystery in cinema: every element is placed to support a revelation that retroactively reframes the entire film, and on second viewing every element that seemed ambiguous resolves with complete clarity. The structural achievement is that the film plays fair — nothing requires the viewer to have been cheated, only to have made the same assumption the film wanted them to make. The ghosts are not there to frighten; they are there because they have unfinished business, which makes the supernatural framework an argument about grief and unresolved connection rather than a horror mechanism.

Haley Joel Osment’s performance is one of the best child performances in cinema, and Bruce Willis does the specific thing the film requires from him: he plays a man who is slightly off, slightly disconnected, in ways that read as grief on first viewing and as something else entirely on second. The film’s emotional climax — the car scene between Cole and his mother — earns its feeling because Shyamalan has built it across the entire film without the audience knowing that is what is being built.

For WritersShyamalan builds the entire film toward a revelation while never cheating — every detail is consistent with both the first-viewing interpretation and the correct one. This is the technique of the double narrative: a story that reads completely one way on first reading and completely another way on second, with both readings supported by the same text. When you design a revelation structure, audit every scene for consistency with both readings before committing. If any detail only works for one interpretation, the architecture is compromised.

↑ All Entries

6. Beetlejuice (1988)

1988 · Film
⭐ 9/10
Tim Burton

“It’s showtime.”

Tim Burton’s film inverts the haunted house premise entirely: the ghosts are the sympathetic protagonists trying to drive the living out of their home, and the horror comedy comes from the bureaucratic afterlife they must navigate to accomplish this. The afterlife in Beetlejuice is organized like the DMV — waiting rooms, case numbers, caseworkers — which is the film’s central joke and its central observation: death is not mysterious, it is inconvenient. Michael Keaton’s Betelgeuse appears for perhaps fifteen minutes of screen time and completely dominates the film.

Burton’s visual invention is at its most unrestrained here — the Handbook for the Recently Deceased, the waiting room full of exotic dead, the sandworm sequence, the banana-shrimp dinner party — and the film holds together because the Maitlands are genuinely sympathetic rather than simply functional. Their attachment to their house is comprehensible and specific, which gives the comedy a warm emotional foundation that pure visual invention cannot provide alone.

For WritersBurton inverts the haunted house premise — the ghosts are sympathetic, the living are the intruders — which transforms a familiar structure into fresh territory by reversing its moral alignment. When you work in an established supernatural subgenre, consider what happens if you reverse the expected moral positions: who is the threat, who is the victim, whose perspective organizes the story. A familiar structure with inverted alignment produces something that feels new while remaining legible.

↑ All Entries

7. The Others (2001)

2001 · Film
⭐ 8.5/10
Alejandro Amenábar

“Sometimes the world of the dead gets mixed up with the world of the living.”

Amenábar’s film is the most atmospheric supernatural thriller of its decade: a Jersey manor house in perpetual fog, children who cannot be exposed to light, a mother whose religious certainty is the film’s emotional engine and eventually its most disturbing element. Nicole Kidman’s Grace is a woman who has organized her entire interior life around rules — religious, domestic, parental — that the film will systematically invalidate, and Kidman plays the rigidity with such total conviction that the collapse lands with genuine weight.

The film shares its structural DNA with The Sixth Sense — a revelation that retroactively reframes the entire story — but arrives at it through atmosphere rather than mystery mechanics. The horror here is sustained dread produced by shadow, silence, and the specific quality of a house that feels wrong in ways the inhabitants cannot articulate. The revelation does not produce a twist ending; it produces the specific sadness of understanding exactly what has been happening all along.

For WritersAmenábar builds the film’s dread through atmosphere — shadow, silence, the sense of wrongness that precedes understanding — rather than through incident. The horror is present throughout before its source is revealed, because the house and its occupants have a quality that the reader registers as wrong before they can identify why. When you write supernatural horror, consider establishing the atmosphere of wrongness before establishing its cause. The reader’s formless unease is more disturbing than specific threat, because it cannot be prepared for.

↑ All Entries

8. Constantine (2005)

2005 · Film
⭐ 7.5/10
Francis Lawrence

“I don’t believe in the devil.” “You should. He believes in you.”

Francis Lawrence’s adaptation takes the Hellblazer source material and translates its theological framework into a Los Angeles noir that works considerably better than its mixed critical reception suggested. Keanu Reeves is correctly cast as John Constantine — not as the working-class British con man of the comics but as a man whose specific quality of detached competence makes him believable as someone who has been doing this long enough to be tired of it. The film’s world-building is its strongest element: a Los Angeles where half-breeds operate between heaven and hell, where the rules of divine and demonic engagement have the precision of legal contracts, where God and Lucifer operate as rival gamblers rather than moral opposites.

Peter Stormare’s Lucifer — arriving in white, unhurried, completely certain of his own position — is the best single devil performance in supernatural cinema. The film earns its ending by taking its theological premise seriously throughout rather than treating it as atmosphere.

For WritersConstantine’s world-building works because the rules of divine and demonic engagement have internal consistency — they function like legal contracts, with specific terms, specific violations, and specific consequences. When you build a supernatural universe with theological elements, give the supernatural factions rules they cannot simply override. The drama comes from characters operating within those constraints rather than from the constraints being arbitrarily suspended when the plot requires it.

↑ All Entries

9. The Conjuring (2013)

2013 · Film
⭐ 8.5/10
James Wan

“The devil exists. God exists. And for us, as people, our very destiny hinges on which we decide to follow.”

James Wan’s film is the best haunted house film since Poltergeist and the one most clearly influenced by it: a large family in a farmhouse, a presence that focuses its attention on the most vulnerable, investigators who bring both professional competence and genuine faith to their work. Wan is a precision instrument for delivering the mechanics of supernatural horror — the build, the misdirect, the strike — and The Conjuring is his most controlled deployment of that instrument. The clapping game sequence is as well-constructed a horror set piece as the decade produced.

What elevates the film above the franchise it spawned is the Warrens: Vera Farmiga and Patrick Wilson play Ed and Lorraine Warren as a couple whose faith is genuine and whose professional experience is vast, and the film treats their religious framework with respect rather than as a plot device to be validated at the climax. The horror is scarier because the people fighting it believe what they believe for reasons the film takes seriously.

For WritersWan’s horror set pieces work through a consistent structure: establish the safe state, introduce the anomaly, withdraw it, re-introduce it at elevated intensity. The misdirect — showing the audience something frightening and then revealing it as a false alarm — makes the subsequent real threat land harder because the audience has lowered their guard. When you write supernatural horror sequences, the structure is: safety, anomaly, false resolution, real strike. The false resolution is not a cheat; it is the mechanism that makes the strike more effective.

↑ All Entries

10. Drag Me to Hell (2009)

2009 · Film
⭐ 8/10
Sam Raimi

“You shamed me.”

Sam Raimi returning to supernatural horror after Spider-Man and delivering the most purely enjoyable film of his career: a bank loan officer who denies a mortgage extension to an elderly Roma woman, receives a curse, and spends the film’s remaining ninety minutes trying to transfer it before she is dragged to hell. The film is funny, disgusting, frightening, and morally precise simultaneously. Raimi operates in the specific register of Evil Dead-derived physical comedy-horror where the grossness is part of the comedy and the comedy does not defuse the horror.

The film’s moral structure is relentless: Christine Brown made a choice motivated by professional ambition rather than right action, and the supernatural consequence is proportionate to the specific nature of the choice. The ending — which refuses the comfort of escape — is the correct ending for a film organized around moral accountability. Alison Lohman carries the film with a specific quality of increasingly desperate resourcefulness that earns the audience’s sympathy while the film maintains that she brought this on herself.

For WritersRaimi’s supernatural curse is a direct consequence of a morally specific choice — not a random supernatural event but a targeted response to a specific act of cowardice and ambition. This moral precision makes the horror feel earned rather than arbitrary. When you design a supernatural threat in fiction, consider whether it can be the direct consequence of a specific moral failure by the protagonist. Supernatural horror that functions as moral consequence is more disturbing than supernatural horror that is simply bad luck.
CTAThe best supernatural fiction is built on tension that compounds. Learn the craft in the Conflict and Tension Handbook.

↑ All Entries

11. Sinister (2012)

2012 · Film
⭐ 8/10
Scott Derrickson

“Once you’ve seen him, he’s seen you.”

Scott Derrickson’s film is the most effectively structured supernatural horror film of the 2010s: a true-crime writer who moves his family into a murder house to write about the case, finds a box of Super 8 films in the attic documenting multiple family murders across decades, and gradually understands that the entity in the films has been watching all along. The Super 8 footage sequences — each one depicting a different family’s murder in a different location and decade — are the film’s achievement, and they work because Derrickson shoots them as found footage with the specific grain and color degradation of the period, making each one feel like a document of something real.

Ethan Hawke’s Ellison Oswalt is the film’s most honest element: a man whose ambition to restore his career is clearly more important to him than his family’s safety, who keeps making the wrong choice for comprehensible reasons, whose self-awareness about his situation arrives too late. The film does not excuse him. The ending is the correct one.

For WritersDerrickson uses found footage within a conventional narrative — the Super 8 films exist as objects within the story rather than as the story’s own format — which gives him the authenticity advantage of found footage without its structural limitations. When you use found or archival material in supernatural fiction, consider whether embedding it within a conventional narrative (characters discovering, watching, analyzing documents) is more flexible than adopting the found footage format entirely. The embedded document can be as disturbing as the format without confining the story to its perspective.

↑ All Entries

12. Hereditary (2018)

2018 · Film
⭐ 9/10
Ari Aster

“What do you want from us?”

Ari Aster’s debut is the most formally accomplished supernatural horror film since The Shining: a family grief drama that reveals itself gradually as a demon cult conspiracy, with the supernatural horror and the psychological horror operating in the same register so precisely that the audience cannot distinguish between them until it is too late. Toni Collette’s performance is the finest in the genre since Shelley Duvall in The Shining — a woman whose grief, guilt, and terror are expressed with such physical specificity that the film’s more extreme moments feel continuous with the psychological reality the first act establishes.

The film’s structural audacity is the death in the first act — an event so abrupt and so completely without preparation that the audience is genuinely destabilized in the way horror films rarely manage. Aster uses the family’s subsequent grief as both psychological realism and supernatural setup, which is the film’s central craft achievement: the grief is real, and the supernatural elements that feed on it are real, and the audience cannot draw a clean line between them because the film never allows one.

For WritersAster builds the supernatural horror from within the psychological horror, making them indistinguishable until the climax forces a choice about which framework to accept. When you write supernatural horror, consider whether the horror can emerge from the characters’ genuine psychological states rather than being imposed on them from outside. Grief, guilt, and paranoia are already horrifying — supernatural horror that feeds on those states rather than replacing them is more disturbing than horror that arrives as a separate event.

↑ All Entries

13. Insidious (2010)

2010 · Film
⭐ 7.5/10
James Wan

“It’s not the house that’s haunted.”

James Wan’s follow-up to Dead Silence earns its place on this list for a single structural innovation that changed the haunted house genre: the haunting is not of the house but of the child, whose ability to astral project has attracted entities from a place Wan calls The Further — a dark dimension populated by the dead who have not moved on. The premise shift from haunted location to haunted person produces a fundamentally different kind of horror because it cannot be resolved by moving. The family cannot leave. The threat travels with them.

The first two acts are first-rate supernatural filmmaking. The third act, which requires a visit to The Further, loses some of the dread that the invisible threat had accumulated — showing the monsters is always a risk in horror, and Wan shows them a little too completely. The ending’s revelation about the father is the film’s best idea and sets up the sequel in a way that the sequel unfortunately squanders.

For WritersWan’s structural shift — from haunted house to haunted person — changes the fundamental stakes because it removes the option of escape. When you design a supernatural threat, ask whether the threat can be attached to the character rather than the location. A threat that cannot be escaped by leaving produces different and more sustained dread than a threat that is geographically contained. The haunted house can be vacated; the haunted person carries the threat wherever they go.

↑ All Entries

14. The Haunting of Hill House (2018)

2018 · TV
⭐ 9/10
Mike Flanagan / Netflix

“A ghost is a memory, a wish, a secret, a regret. A haunting is a place made of stone and wood that is most sincerely haunted.”

Mike Flanagan’s series is the best supernatural television produced since Twin Peaks, and it earns that comparison because it is doing what Twin Peaks did: using the supernatural framework to explore something genuine about human psychology and family damage. The Crain family’s experience at Hill House in 1992 is the trauma that organizes the rest of their lives, and the series constructs the haunting and the trauma as inseparable — the ghosts are the grief, the grief is the haunting, and the two cannot be distinguished because Flanagan does not want them to be.

The long takes — particularly episode six’s four extended single shots — are the series’ formal achievement: a full episode with almost no cuts, following different family members through a single night, constructed as a sustained piece of cinema rather than as television. Flanagan hides ghosts throughout the series in the background of frames the audience is not watching, which rewards second viewings with the specific horror of retroactive recognition.

For WritersFlanagan constructs the haunting and the trauma as the same thing — the ghosts are literally the family’s grief and guilt given form, which means the supernatural and the psychological cannot be separated. When you build a long-form supernatural narrative, consider whether the supernatural elements can be the direct embodiment of the characters’ internal states rather than external threats those characters must face. The most disturbing haunted house is one where the house is haunted by the family’s own damage.

↑ All Entries

15. Midnight Mass (2021)

2021 · TV
⭐ 8.5/10
Mike Flanagan / Netflix

“What am I? I am the Word. I am the Word made flesh.”

Flanagan’s most theologically ambitious project: a small island community, a charismatic new priest, a series of miracles that are gradually revealed to be the work of something that is not God. The series is the most serious examination of religious faith in supernatural fiction — it takes the community’s Catholicism completely seriously, understands what faith provides and what it costs, and builds its horror from within that framework rather than imposing the supernatural threat from outside it. Father Paul’s belief is genuine and his corruption is the more disturbing for it.

The series is slow — deliberately, productively slow, the kind of pacing that builds community before destroying it — and its monologues are longer than contemporary television usually permits. Flanagan earns this because the characters speaking are worth listening to. Hamish Linklater’s Father Paul and Zach Gilford’s Riley Flynn are given space to articulate their positions on faith and doubt with a specificity that the horror ultimately tests rather than resolves.

For WritersFlanagan builds the community before destroying it — the audience knows the island, its people, and their relationships before the horror accelerates — which means every loss carries weight. When you write supernatural horror that operates on a community scale, invest in the community before the threat arrives. The horror of watching a community destroyed is proportional to how much the reader values what is being destroyed. Undeveloped community produces spectacle; developed community produces grief.

↑ All Entries

16. Stranger Things (2016–present)

2016– · TV
⭐ 9/10 (S1–2) · 7/10 (S3–4)
The Duffer Brothers / Netflix

“Mornings are for coffee and contemplation.”

The Duffer Brothers’ first two seasons are a masterwork of atmospheric supernatural horror operating through 1980s nostalgia — not as pastiche but as genuine emotional texture. The Upside Down is a fully realized supernatural environment rather than a generic dark dimension, and the show’s willingness to keep it partially unexplained is its best restraint decision. Millie Bobby Brown’s Eleven is the series’ emotional center and its most original creation: a child weapon who is also simply a child, whose specific loneliness and capacity for violence coexist without the show needing to resolve the tension between them.

Seasons three and four expand the scale significantly and lose some of the intimate horror that made the first two seasons work. The Upside Down becomes more explained, the threats become more spectacular, and the show’s emotional core gets diluted by the size of the ensemble and the demands of franchise storytelling. It remains very good television. It is no longer the specific thing it was in season one, which is a specific loss even when what replaces it is competent.

For WritersThe Duffer Brothers’ best restraint decision is keeping the Upside Down partially unexplained — showing enough to establish a consistent visual and atmospheric grammar without providing a complete taxonomy of its rules. Partial explanation is more disturbing than full explanation because the reader’s imagination fills the unexplained space with something worse than the author could specify. When you design a supernatural environment, identify what must be explained for the story to function and what is more powerful left unexplained. Explain the former; protect the latter.

↑ All Entries

17. Charmed (1998–2006)

1998–2006 · TV
⭐ 7.5/10
Constance M. Burge / The WB

“Together we are the Power of Three.”

The original Charmed — not the 2018 reboot, which does not exist — ran eight seasons on the WB and demonstrated that supernatural fiction organized around family rather than around individual heroism produces a different and often warmer kind of story. The Halliwell sisters are witches by inheritance whose power requires them to work together, which means the show’s central relationship is the sisterhood rather than any romantic subplot, and the sisterhood is developed across eight seasons with enough genuine emotional investment that the losses when they occur carry real weight.

The show is inconsistent — season five dips, season eight rushes its conclusion — but the best episodes demonstrate what the supernatural procedural can do with a stable ensemble that has had time to develop genuine complexity. Shannen Doherty’s Prue anchors the first three seasons with a specific quality of driven determination, and her departure changes the show’s register permanently. The show knows it is entertainment and delivers it with craft.

For WritersCharmed organizes its supernatural power around a group requirement — the sisters must work together, their power derives from the relationship rather than from individual ability — which makes the interpersonal dynamics load-bearing rather than decorative. When you design supernatural power systems, consider whether the power can be contingent on relationship rather than individual capacity. Power that requires collaboration makes the relationships between characters structurally essential to the plot rather than emotional texture surrounding it.

↑ All Entries

18. Ghost (1990)

1990 · Film
⭐ 7.5/10
Jerry Zucker

“Ditto.”

Jerry Zucker’s film is the most commercially successful supernatural romance in cinema history and earns its place on this list through the precision of its central concept: a dead man who cannot communicate with the woman he loves except through a fraudulent psychic who he must convince to tell the truth. The triangular communication structure — Sam to Oda Mae to Molly — produces its comedy and its pathos from the same mechanism, and Whoopi Goldberg’s Oda Mae Brown is the film’s genuine achievement: a con woman who is a con woman for comprehensible reasons and whose gradual confrontation with the reality she has been faking is more affecting than the romance it surrounds.

The pottery scene is one of cinema’s most famous romantic images and earned it on cultural impact rather than subtlety. The film’s supernatural framework — the specific rules of how the dead can interact with the living, the shadow figures who claim the damned — is developed with enough internal consistency that it functions as a complete cosmology rather than as plot convenience.

For WritersThe triangular communication structure — Sam cannot speak to Molly directly and must operate through Oda Mae — produces both the film’s comedy and its pathos from the same formal constraint. When you design a supernatural limitation for a character, consider whether the limitation can generate both comedy and emotional weight rather than serving one function alone. Constraints that force indirect communication are particularly productive because the indirection itself becomes expressive — what cannot be said directly is sometimes said more powerfully through the workaround.

↑ All Entries

19. Fringe (2008–2013)

2008–2013 · TV
⭐ 8.5/10
J.J. Abrams / Fox

“There’s more than one of everything.”

J.J. Abrams, Roberto Orci, and Alex Kurtzman’s series begins as an X-Files successor — FBI fringe science division investigating paranormal phenomena — and gradually reveals itself as something more ambitious: a parallel universe story organized around a father’s love for his son and the consequences of a single catastrophic decision made out of that love. Walter Bishop’s theft of his alternate-universe son is the event from which everything flows, and John Noble’s performance as Walter — across all his variations, across the universe boundaries, across the timeline disruptions — is the best acting in supernatural television.

The show is willing to commit to consequences in ways that network television usually refuses: the parallel universe is a fully developed environment with its own version of every character, and the show invests enough in those alternate versions that the conflicts between universes carry genuine moral weight rather than simply narrative stakes. Season four’s timeline disruption is the show’s most ambitious gambit and the one that asks the most from its audience.

For WritersFringe’s parallel universe works because the alternate versions of the characters are genuinely different rather than simply evil counterparts — Fauxlivia, Walternate, and the other alternates are products of different histories that the show takes seriously. When you write parallel versions of your characters, give each version a coherent internal logic rooted in their different experiences rather than making them simple inversions of the primary character. The most interesting parallel version is the one that makes you understand how the primary character might have become something else under different circumstances.

↑ All Entries

20. American Horror Story (2011–present)

2011– · TV
⭐ 9/10 (S1–3) · 6/10 (S4+)
Ryan Murphy / Brad Falchuk / FX

“In this house, murder is the mortar.”

Ryan Murphy and Brad Falchuk’s anthology series is the most visually inventive supernatural television produced and the most uneven. The first three seasons — Murder House, Asylum, Coven — are each extraordinary in different registers: Murder House as pure haunted house horror, Asylum as institutional dread with genuine psychological weight, Coven as supernatural camp done with complete commitment. After season three the anthology format begins to strain as the connective tissue between seasons weakens and the visual invention starts substituting for narrative structure.

Jessica Lange across the first four seasons is the show’s defining performance: she plays each season’s central female antagonist with a specific quality of theatrical intelligence that meets Murphy’s visual ambition at exactly the right level. The show without Lange is a different and lesser show. The first three seasons remain the best argument for what the supernatural anthology format can achieve when it is working at full capacity.

For WritersMurphy’s anthology format — a new story, new characters, same actors in different roles each season — is more demanding than it looks: each season must function as a complete narrative while the recurring actors provide continuity of quality rather than continuity of character. When you write episodic or anthology supernatural fiction, consider what provides the through-line when the characters change. In AHS it is the visual grammar, the thematic concerns, and the performers’ quality — none of which require narrative continuity. Identify what holds your anthology together before deciding what can change between installments.

What the Supernatural Gets Right

The twenty entries here demonstrate that the supernatural genre’s most durable entries share a quality that has nothing to do with effects budgets or mythology complexity: they take their premises seriously. The haunting in Hill House is real. Mulder’s belief is justified. Walter Bishop’s love for his son has consequences that cannot be undone. The supernatural element in each case is load-bearing — it is not decoration on top of a story that would exist without it, it is the mechanism by which the story’s actual subject is made accessible.

The genre’s failures are always failures of commitment. When the supernatural becomes spectacular rather than meaningful, when the mythology expands past the point where it can be closed, when the ghosts stop representing something and start simply being something, the genre loses what makes it worth the investment. The best of these twenty entries know what their ghosts are for — and spend every episode earning the answer.

What Do You Think?

Missing an essential entry? Disagree with a placement? Drop a comment below.

↑ Back to Navigation

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top