Thunderbolts (2025) — Review

Thunderbolts (2025)
1 / 10

I have watched Thunderbolts once. The 1 reflects honest evaluation of one of the Phase Five entries that confirmed the franchise crisis state extends across the broader MCU regardless of specific property changes. The film attempts to assemble a team of antiheroes and morally compromised characters into something resembling the Suicide Squad framework that DC had explored. The attempt fails. The characters do not cohere as ensemble. The mental-health themes are deployed as decorative content rather than as load-bearing plot. The Sentry / Void antagonist mechanic is structurally confused. Florence Pugh’s Yelena Belova carries the film through individual performance quality without the surrounding production supporting her work. The 1 reflects honest evaluation of a film whose individual elements operate at varying quality levels embedded in a production that does not function as unified narrative.

The Setup

Valentina Allegra de Fontaine has been recruiting morally compromised operatives across multiple Disney+ series and MCU productions. The roster includes Yelena Belova (Black Widow), Bucky Barnes (Winter Soldier), Red Guardian (Yelena’s surrogate father from Black Widow), Ghost (Ant-Man and the Wasp), John Walker (the failed Captain America replacement from The Falcon and the Winter Soldier), and Taskmaster. The operatives are sent to a remote vault for various missions and discover that Valentina has been arranging for them to kill each other as part of her broader plan to eliminate compromising witnesses to her covert programs.

The team members survive the initial vault situation and discover Robert Reynolds, a Project Sentry test subject whose unstable mental state and reality-warping capabilities threaten broader destruction. Reynolds is the Sentry, a Superman-analogue with parallel personality the Void that emerges during mental health crises. The middle act involves the team navigating their broken trust while attempting to manage the Reynolds situation. The third act features the Sentry/Void’s near-destruction of New York and the team’s eventual stabilization of Reynolds through emotional acceptance rather than through physical combat.

Florence Pugh’s Performance

Florence Pugh continues as Yelena Belova in her largest MCU appearance since Black Widow. The performance is genuinely strong and represents the film’s most consistent craft achievement. Pugh brings specific physical capability, emotional accessibility, and comedic timing to the role. The Yelena character has been the franchise’s most successful new lead introduction of the Phase Four-Five period.

The performance is operating in a different register than the surrounding film supports. Pugh commits to genuine dramatic engagement with Yelena’s depression, professional disillusionment, and grief over her sister Natasha. The surrounding production does not match the performance level. Other team members operate at substantially lower commitment levels. The dialogue serving Pugh’s specific dramatic moments is uneven. The cumulative effect is that Pugh’s individual achievement exists within a production that cannot fully support what she is doing.

The pattern matches the broader Phase Four-Five issue of strong individual performances trapped within structurally compromised productions. Pugh’s Yelena in Black Widow (rated 0) had been the film’s only successful element. Pugh’s Yelena in Thunderbolts is similarly the film’s central asset. The franchise has consistently used Pugh’s commitment to elevate material that does not deserve her work. The pattern is unsustainable. Pugh’s individual career commitment cannot continue rescuing productions that fail through systematic problems beyond any individual actor’s ability to address.

For Writers

Thunderbolts demonstrates the limits of individual performance rescue. Florence Pugh delivers genuinely strong work that operates at higher craft level than the surrounding production supports. The performance cannot save the broader film because films fail through accumulated structural problems rather than through individual element weakness. Even exceptional performances can only rescue productions whose underlying structure is fundamentally sound. The lesson for writers and production developers is that performance quality is necessary but not sufficient for film success. If your screenplay does not support your lead performer, the lead performer cannot save the screenplay through commitment alone. Pugh’s Yelena in this film delivers what the character requires. The film around the character does not deliver what the ensemble framework requires. The performance survives the failure as individual achievement. The film does not survive as production. Audiences experience both elements but the structural failure dominates the broader response.

The Mental Health Decoration

The film extensively positions itself as engagement with mental health themes. Yelena’s depression. Walker’s PTSD from his Captain America failure. Ghost’s continuing isolation. Reynolds’s psychotic dissociation. The team’s collective trauma and emotional dysregulation. The marketing emphasized these elements as evidence of the film’s substantive thematic engagement.

The mental health content operates as decorative signaling rather than as load-bearing plot. Remove the specific mental health framing and the basic plot proceeds with minor modifications. Yelena’s depression is depicted through specific verbal references but does not generate the team’s mission dynamics. Walker’s PTSD is referenced but does not drive his decision-making in ways the script could not have produced through other character traits. Reynolds’s psychotic dissociation operates as antagonist mechanic that the script could have generated through more conventional villain motivation.

The pattern is the broader Phase Four-Five issue of decorative thematic signaling combined with weak storytelling. Mental health themes are positioned as evidence of the production’s substantive ambition. The themes themselves do not generate plot or character development beyond their immediate scene references. The audience receives the signaling as marketing emphasis rather than as load-bearing dramatic foundation. The signaling generates audience resistance that the franchise has consistently underestimated.

The Reynolds / Void resolution operates through emotional acceptance rather than through physical combat. The team eventually stabilizes Reynolds by engaging with his mental health rather than by fighting him. The resolution is presented as triumph of compassion over violence. The execution feels procedural rather than earned. The audience receives the emotional resolution as plot requirement rather than as developed character growth.

The Sentry / Void Mechanic

Lewis Pullman plays Robert Reynolds as the Sentry / Void character. The character is a Superman-analogue with parallel personality that emerges during mental health crises. The Sentry possesses essentially unlimited power. The Void represents Reynolds’s depression and self-loathing manifested as destructive force. The character’s mental state determines which version operates at any given moment.

The mechanic is structurally confused. The film cannot establish clear rules for when Reynolds operates as Sentry versus Void. The transitions appear to happen for plot convenience rather than through consistent internal logic. The character’s near-unlimited power requires the script to invent specific weaknesses on demand to allow the resolution. The pattern matches the broader MCU issue of expanding character capabilities to meet plot needs at the cost of system constraints that drama requires.

Pullman’s performance is professionally committed within the limits of the material. The character receives sufficient screen time to establish basic identity without receiving the development that would make Reynolds function as compelling antagonist with interior life. The mental health framing requires audience investment that the script does not adequately earn through depicted character development.

The Team That Cannot Cohere

The Thunderbolts ensemble includes Yelena Belova, Bucky Barnes, Red Guardian, Ghost, John Walker, and Taskmaster. The characters have appeared across multiple previous MCU productions with varying levels of development. The film attempts to assemble them into functional ensemble despite their disparate backgrounds and incompatible personality dynamics.

The ensemble does not cohere. The characters operate as collection of individuals rather than as functional team. The relationships between team members are referenced rather than developed. The dialogue rotates through the characters without finding the specific interactions that would establish the team as ensemble. The film attempts ensemble character moments without providing the foundation work that would make them land.

Sebastian Stan as Bucky Barnes operates with appropriate professional commitment but receives minimal new character development. David Harbour as Red Guardian continues his Black Widow comedic register without developing beyond the initial introduction. Hannah John-Kamen as Ghost receives almost no screen time relative to her speaking-role positioning. Wyatt Russell as John Walker continues the failed-Captain-America material from The Falcon and the Winter Soldier. Olga Kurylenko as Taskmaster receives early death that the franchise has been recycling Taskmaster appearances without committing to the character.

The Suicide Squad framework that the production was apparently attempting requires substantial character development time that the runtime does not provide. DC’s various Suicide Squad films had faced similar challenges. The ensemble-of-antiheroes structure has been consistently difficult to execute successfully across multiple franchise attempts. Thunderbolts does not solve the problem. The film continues the pattern of failed ensemble-antihero attempts that the broader genre has demonstrated.

Craft: The Phase Five Pattern Continues

Craft Note

Thunderbolts is the Phase Five entry that confirmed the franchise crisis state extends across the broader MCU regardless of specific property changes or ensemble experiments. The film operates through the same decorative thematic signaling, weak storytelling, and structural mismanagement that characterized previous Phase Four-Five productions. Florence Pugh’s continued performance commitment cannot rescue productions whose underlying problems exceed any individual actor’s ability to address.

The mental health themes operate as decoration rather than as load-bearing plot foundation. The Sentry / Void mechanic is structurally confused. The team ensemble does not cohere despite the established characters’ previous appearances. The Suicide Squad framework that the production was attempting requires character development that the runtime did not provide. The cumulative effect is a film that fails through accumulated structural problems rather than through individual element weakness.

The lesson for franchise filmmaking is that the pattern of decorative thematic signaling combined with weak storytelling cannot be sustained indefinitely. Audiences have been responding to the pattern across multiple Phase Four-Five productions through reduced attendance and negative critical response. Thunderbolts continued the pattern despite the documented commercial damage that similar approaches had caused. The franchise has not yet adjusted its underlying creative approach in ways that would address the broader audience confidence collapse.

The 1 rating reflects honest evaluation of the structural failures despite Pugh’s individual performance achievement. The film has moments that work. The aggregate film does not. The Yelena Belova character continues to operate at higher craft level than the surrounding productions support. The pattern is unsustainable for the franchise long-term. The MCU’s Phase Five problems persist through this release.

For analysis of the broader Phase Five crisis state, see How The Multiverse Destroyed The MCU.

The Verdict

A 1. Thunderbolts is one of the Phase Five entries that confirmed the franchise crisis state extends across the broader MCU regardless of specific property changes. Florence Pugh’s Yelena Belova continues to operate at higher craft level than the surrounding productions support. The mental health themes operate as decorative signaling rather than as load-bearing plot. The Sentry / Void antagonist mechanic is structurally confused. The team ensemble does not cohere despite the established characters’ previous appearances. The Suicide Squad framework that the production was apparently attempting fails through inadequate character development time.

I have watched it once. I do not plan to watch it again. The 1 rating reflects honest evaluation across every dimension where the film fails. Other viewers may rate the film slightly higher based on Pugh’s continued strong performance. The 1 reflects what the film delivers as a complete production. The MCU’s Phase Five problems persist through this release. The franchise has not yet demonstrated capacity to address the broader audience confidence collapse that has defined the phase.


FAQ

Is Florence Pugh really the best part again?

Yes. Pugh has been the most consistent strong performer across her MCU appearances from Black Widow (2021) through Hawkeye (Disney+ 2021) through Thunderbolts. The character has been the franchise’s most successful new lead introduction of the Phase Four-Five period. Pugh’s continued professional commitment elevates material that does not deserve her work. The pattern is unsustainable. The franchise cannot continue relying on her individual performance rescue without providing scripts that match her commitment level.

Are the mental health themes really decorative?

By the load-bearing-versus-decorative framework, yes. Remove the specific mental health framing and the basic plot proceeds with minor modifications. Yelena’s depression is referenced but does not generate the team’s mission dynamics. Walker’s PTSD is mentioned but does not drive decision-making. Reynolds’s psychotic dissociation operates as antagonist mechanic. The themes are layered on top of standard team-of-antiheroes plot rather than emerging from it. The signaling generates audience resistance similar to other Phase Four-Five productions.

How does this compare to Suicide Squad?

Thunderbolts attempts the Suicide Squad framework that DC has explored across multiple films (Suicide Squad 2016, The Suicide Squad 2021). The ensemble-of-antiheroes structure has been consistently difficult to execute successfully. James Gunn’s The Suicide Squad in 2021 was the most successful version of the framework. Thunderbolts does not approach Gunn’s achievement. The Suicide Squad framework remains genre-difficult and Thunderbolts continues the pattern of failed attempts.

Is the Sentry / Void worth caring about?

Limited. Lewis Pullman’s performance is professionally committed. The character mechanic is structurally confused. The transitions between Sentry and Void appear to happen for plot convenience rather than through consistent internal logic. The character has potential that future appearances might develop further. The Thunderbolts introduction does not establish the character sufficiently to predict whether subsequent appearances will deliver on the potential.

Does the ensemble work?

No. The characters operate as collection of individuals rather than as functional team. The relationships between team members are referenced rather than developed. The dialogue rotates through the characters without finding the specific interactions that would establish the ensemble dynamic. Florence Pugh’s Yelena carries individual scenes. The team scenes do not cohere into ensemble function.

Should I watch this if I’m completing the MCU?

Reluctantly. The film establishes the Thunderbolts team that subsequent productions may build on. The Sentry character introduction may have broader franchise implications. The Florence Pugh material continues her arc that has been the most consistent Phase Four-Five element. Completists can watch once. Most viewers can safely skip without missing essential franchise context.

How does this fit Phase Five?

Thunderbolts is one of the Phase Five entries that demonstrated the franchise’s continued crisis state. The phase contains Quantumania (-100), Deadpool & Wolverine (1), Brave New World (1), and Thunderbolts (1). The phase has not produced clear creative success. The commercial performance has been mixed with only Deadpool & Wolverine generating substantial revenue through nostalgia leverage. Thunderbolts continued the pattern of weak commercial and critical reception.

What about the commercial performance?

The film grossed approximately three hundred and eighty-two million dollars worldwide on a production budget of approximately one hundred and eighty million. The performance was below MCU expectations and was specifically below what Deadpool & Wolverine had generated through legacy character returns. The commercial decline reflects the broader Phase Five audience confidence problems that persist despite individual property variations.

Will the MCU recover from Phase Five?

The franchise’s response to the Phase Five problems has included production schedule reductions, the casting of Robert Downey Jr. as Doctor Doom for upcoming Avengers films, and reduced Disney+ series production. Whether these adjustments will produce sustained audience recovery remains an open question. The patterns that defined Phase Four-Five have generated audience resistance that may not be reversible through marketing adjustments alone. The Avengers: Doomsday and Avengers: Secret Wars productions currently in development may use the multiverse premise to reset the continuity back to something more manageable. The execution will determine whether the franchise can recover or whether the decline will continue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top