8 / 10
The Golden Voyage of Sinbad is the second Harryhausen Sinbad film and the last great Harryhausen fantasy adventure. Gordon Hessler directed it. John Phillip Law plays Sinbad. Caroline Munro plays Margiana, a slave girl with a tattooed palm that turns out to be a map. Tom Baker plays Koura, the evil sorcerer, two years before he was cast as the Fourth Doctor on Doctor Who. The plot involves a magical golden amulet that comes in three pieces, leading Sinbad and Koura on parallel quests to assemble it. The film made approximately fifteen million dollars on a one million dollar budget and is the most commercially successful Harryhausen production.
The film was the first Harryhausen feature without a Bernard Herrmann score. Miklós Rózsa composed instead. Rózsa was an established A-list film composer who had won three Oscars in the 1940s for Spellbound, A Double Life, and Ben-Hur. His Golden Voyage score is more orchestrally lush than Herrmann’s work but loses some of the rhythmic specificity that made the Herrmann scores feel like extensions of the animation.
Tom Baker
Tom Baker’s Koura is one of the great fantasy villains of the 1970s. Baker plays the sorcerer as a man whose magic is killing him. Every time he uses his power, he ages visibly. By the third act he is a withered husk barely able to stand. The choice gives the villain a specific cost the audience can track. Koura is not just evil. He is paying for what he does, and the payment is on screen.
The performance was the audition that effectively got Baker the Doctor Who role two years later. Producer Barry Letts has discussed the film as the moment he realized Baker had the specific eccentricity needed for the Time Lord. The connection between Koura and the Fourth Doctor is more visible than the casting history would suggest. Both characters share a particular kind of magnetic, slightly mad, theatrical authority.
For Writers
A villain whose actions visibly cost them is more compelling than a villain whose power is unlimited. Koura ages every time he uses magic. The audience can see what each spell takes from him. The lesson is that giving characters physical costs for their abilities provides a built-in dramatic ceiling. A character who can do anything without consequence is a problem. A character whose every choice carries a visible price is a story engine.
The Kali Fight
The film’s signature sequence is the swordfight between Sinbad and three of his men against a six-armed living statue of the goddess Kali. The statue is animated frame by frame to wield six swords simultaneously against three live actors. The choreography is more complex than the skeleton swordfight in Jason and the Argonauts. Harryhausen worked through the sequence across roughly five months of animation.
The fight ends with Kali falling from a high platform and shattering on the stone floor. The audience can see the goddess crack into pieces as she lands. The film treats the statue’s destruction with appropriate weight. The sequence is the highlight of the production and stands alongside Harryhausen’s other major fight sequences from his earlier work.
For Writers
A specific creature design choice can define an entire action sequence. Kali’s six arms transform a standard swordfight into something the audience has never seen. The film could have used a generic giant. It used something that fights differently than a human. The lesson is that creatures with structural differences from humans create combat dynamics that human-versus-human combat cannot produce. Build the creature’s body around the kind of fight you want to stage.
The Centaur and the Griffin
The third-act battle between a centaur and a griffin is the production’s other major creature sequence. The centaur is the cursed servant of Koura. The griffin emerges from the volcanic interior of the island. The two creatures fight each other while Sinbad and Koura race to complete the amulet. The sequence is the film’s clearest set piece in the tradition of Harryhausen’s earlier mythological battles.
The choice to have two creatures fight each other gives the audience a different kind of spectacle than monster-versus-hero combat. Both creatures are doing real damage. Neither has a stake in the human protagonists. The fight is its own contained drama within the larger plot. The technique would influence subsequent kaiju and monster films for the next several decades.
For Writers
Conflict between secondary characters can carry as much dramatic weight as conflict involving the protagonist. The centaur-versus-griffin fight has stakes the audience cares about even though neither creature is the protagonist. The lesson is that supporting characters and their conflicts can do real storytelling work. You do not always have to make the protagonist the center of every dramatic moment. Sometimes the strongest scenes are the ones happening next to the protagonist.
Craft Note
Gordon Hessler directed. Brian Clemens wrote, story by Clemens and Ray Harryhausen. Harryhausen animated and co-produced with Charles H. Schneer. Miklós Rózsa composed. John Phillip Law as Sinbad. Caroline Munro as Margiana. Tom Baker as Koura. Takis Emmanuel as Achmed. Released December 1973. Columbia Pictures. Approximately one million dollar budget. Approximately fifteen million dollar worldwide gross. Filmed in Spain and Malta.
The Verdict
8/10. The last great Harryhausen fantasy adventure. Tom Baker’s villain is one of the best in his career. The Kali fight is a high point in the Harryhausen filmography. The centaur-griffin battle is one of his best creature-versus-creature sequences. Watch it after Jason and the Argonauts and The 7th Voyage of Sinbad.
FAQ
Is this the second Sinbad film?
The second Harryhausen Sinbad film. The 7th Voyage of Sinbad (1958) is the first. Sinbad and the Eye of the Tiger (1977) is the third and weakest.
Is Tom Baker really in this?
Yes. Two years before he was cast as the Fourth Doctor on Doctor Who. The performance is one of his best film roles.
Who is Caroline Munro?
British actress who became known for genre films. The Golden Voyage of Sinbad was her major early role. She later appeared in The Spy Who Loved Me (1977).
Why no Bernard Herrmann?
Herrmann had stopped working on Harryhausen films after Jason and the Argonauts in 1963. Various professional reasons. Miklós Rózsa replaced him on this production.
How does it compare to The 7th Voyage of Sinbad?
Slightly less iconic. The 7th Voyage has the foundational sequences. The Golden Voyage has the more complex creature animations and the better antagonist.
Is the third Sinbad film worth watching?
Sinbad and the Eye of the Tiger (1977) is the weakest of the three. The creatures are still good but the script and production around them are noticeably less ambitious.
Should I watch this?
Yes. The last great Harryhausen adventure before Clash of the Titans.